Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 128 58% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 157 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 574 610 566 550 579 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 669 Write 585 Mixed 631 SusWrite 576 139% 615 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 45.6 147% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 517 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 436 325% 435 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 147%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 10.6 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,160x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,680x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	636x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	359x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16