Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$378
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
96% 203 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 753
80% 622 Pts
64-Core 758
51% 758 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,090
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3559 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Lighting 665
Reflection 609
Parallax 751
175% 675 fps
MRender 550
Gravity 719
Splatting 347
200% 539 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 198%
Great: 195%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
119GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 138 106 109 104 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,480
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 219
244% 1,093 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 79.5
289% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 272
344% 602 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 196%
Great: 271%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,476
Write 1,013
Mixed 505
219% 998 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 48.7
221% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 750
612% 874 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 237%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
106GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 288 288 290 290 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 493
Mixed 413
SusWrite 308
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 61.9
215% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 134 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 131
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 135
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$63
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 170 170 167 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 145
Mixed 32
SusWrite 168
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 115
Write 105
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 114
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
73.6% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 20.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 17,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,431
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback