Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 18:49
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 120
57% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 344
34% 278 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 78.1
Parallax 95.8
60% 82.7 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 64.2
58% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 371
Mixed 320
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 30.5
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 27.5
23% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
62GB free
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 55 55 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 473
Write 360
Mixed 115
SusWrite 91.9
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 32.5
108% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 26.9
66% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
18GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 61
Write 65.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 61.3
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
73GB free
Firmware: SB4OC7DP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 31.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 41.4
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback