Asus P5B-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5B-V  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$190
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.1% Poor
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 75.5
27% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 152
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 152
10% 152 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
MSI(1462 127C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 6.2
5% 15.4 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 12
Splatting 14
4% 14.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 400GB (2007)-$42
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 42 55 61 60 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 69.8
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 49.8
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 21%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5B-V Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5B-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback