Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 168 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 390 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M 3,227 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	5.4% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 6.38 Parallax 4.75 5% 5.79 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 7.26 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.4% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 307 307 307 306 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 446 Write 430 Mixed 371 SusWrite 320 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 38.4 113% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 359 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M471B5673DZ1-CF8 Samsung M471B5673DZ1-CF8 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2720QMIntel $85Bench 58%, 7,798 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M471B5673DZ1-CF8 Samsung M471B5673DZ1-CF8 12GBHynixBench 32%, 6 samples	1x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $125

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16