Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 12:10
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 94
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 119
59% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 339
33% 271 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.7% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 34.6
23% 29.8 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 30.3
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$169
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335u
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 152 140 128 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 261
Write 184
Mixed 221
SusWrite 143
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 32.1
121% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 39.7
37% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
108GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 54 52 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 141
Write 131
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 53.9
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
79GB free
Firmware: V54OA58A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 54 52 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 61.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 53.8
39% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G3D1869DE1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback