Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
8 months ago, 18 days ago.
MotherboardFoxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$230
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27% Poor
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 45.7
19% 38.8 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 158
24% 174 Pts
64-Core 180
12% 180 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 41%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$20
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 87 62 91 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 80.8
Write 57.5
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 80.8
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback