Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 10:08
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 188 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 358 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PwrHis(1787 2339) 1GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 30.4 21% 28.2 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 24 Splatting 31 23% 27.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 10 66 72 63 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 366 Write 277 Mixed 122 SusWrite 79.8 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 16 56% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 20.3 DQ Mixed 40.1 27% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 53%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB 2,495 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 192GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 71.8 Write 68.8 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 38.5 41% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	331x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	324x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	282x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	224x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16