| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Boot Drive | 129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Default string (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Default SKYBAY |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190714 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 17 '19 at 07:44 |
| Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
72%
Very good
|
82% 144 Pts
|
44% 330 Pts
|
18% 291 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 438 434 439 438 MB/s
|
129%
Outstanding
|
94% 415 MB/s
|
221% 79.1 MB/s
|
265% 354 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB
7GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 3.6 3.1 4.5 4.4 3.9 MB/s
|
6.86%
Terrible
|
17% 14 MB/s
|
80% 1.97 MB/s
| |
|
|
106% 96.2 MB/s
|
155% 3.33 MB/s
| ||
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
55GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 19 20 19 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
71% 67.3 MB/s
|
76% 2.47 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
57GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 18 18 18 16 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
31% 24.9 MB/s
|
147% 3.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99P5700-002.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.8%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
33% 11.4 GB/s
|
56% 70.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,489 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Default string
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,018x |
| Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 955x |
| Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 905x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 485x |
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 457x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |