Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
24 days ago, 24 days ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault SKYBAY
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 06:40
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.3% Good
1-Core 120
2-Core 214
80% 167 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 312
42% 307 Pts
64-Core 315
21% 315 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5068
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 39.3
10% 37.2 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 26
6% 22.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 455 444 466 485 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 428
Mixed 382
SusWrite 463
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 66.8
225% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 358
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 133%
Great: 130%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB
7GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 3.7 3 4.3 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 14.5
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 4
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.3
117% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
1GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 159
Write 58
Mixed 66.8
102% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.9
152% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
55GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 35 21 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 159
Write 35.6
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 27.8
73% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.1
76% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
57GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 18 19 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 19.5
31% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.6
128% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99P5700-002.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical string Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback