Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 32.6 2-Core 52.3 33% 48.1 Pts	4-Core 56.6 8-Core 63.7 8% 60.2 Pts	64-Core 62.8 4% 62.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2116) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 1 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 4.78 2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB 5,641 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 204 205 210 210 210 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.9% Average	Read 230 Write 210 Mixed 215 SusWrite 200 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 19.9 62% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 82.4 DQ Mixed 98.5 78% 109 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 104%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 218GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 30.2 Write 20.1 SusWrite 24.7 31% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16