Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 03:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 594
79% 590 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 120
Parallax 114
100% 119 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 105
Splatting 88.8
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 326 326 326 326 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,081
Write 1,494
Mixed 701
SusWrite 358
256% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 52.1
230% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 714
664% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 226%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
196GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 437 486 493 494 279 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 493
Mixed 466
SusWrite 418
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 45.7
203% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 204 204 204 202 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 160
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 202
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 35
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 32
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 107%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback