Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 170
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 586
56% 461 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 38.4
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 28
Splatting 33.9
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 398 405 413 381 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 401
Mixed 393
SusWrite 390
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 49.9
163% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 277
224% 318 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Team L3 SSD 120GB
70GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 145 145 141 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 430
Write 123
Mixed 212
SusWrite 143
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 20.3
104% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 6.6
29% 66 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 75 89 91 90 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 85.4
Write 85.1
Mixed 11
SusWrite 85.8
48% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback