Acer Veriton N4640G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton N4640G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton N4640G
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 21:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 322
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Acer(1025 1069) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.06
0% 4.93 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.8
8% 9.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST500DM002-1BD142 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TC71202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 89 75 127 109 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 430
Write 389
Mixed 361
SusWrite 115
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 47.1
158% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 142
150% 248 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 18.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 21.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton N4640G Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton N4640G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback