Matech AP8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Matech AP8B75-M (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '19 at 21:23
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 501 58% 450 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Above average	Lighting 74.6 Reflection 75.1 Parallax 65.4 61% 71.7 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 69.1 Splatting 72.1 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB 3,901 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT08D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 118 129 105 80 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 379 Write 134 Mixed 139 SusWrite 105 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 22 94% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 25.6 33% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 63GB free Firmware: 16.01H16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 76 75 72 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 133 Write 128 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 75.3 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 378GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 66 66 60 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 68 Write 68.3 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 63.7 44% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 17,809 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.7 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AP8B75-M Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Matech AP8B75-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	37x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	17x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	12x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	14x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	8x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
PSD34G160081 4x4GBPatriotBench 53%, 354 samples	4x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $479

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16