Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	123.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '19 at 18:47
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% , 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 76 1-Core 134 2-Core 259 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 987 89% 749 Pts	64-Core 2,003 124% 2,003 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841 13,762 User benchmarks, average bench 101% AMD(1002 081E) Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.11.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 100 Parallax 201 107% 144 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 148 Splatting 143 110% 132 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 346GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 459 463 468 398 302 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 468 Mixed 440 SusWrite 426 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 42.8 152% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 357 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 129%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 10GB free Firmware: 401000WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 427 Write 461 Mixed 383 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 40.2 146% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 234 207% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 15GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 468 Mixed 396 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 36 141% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 354 267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 65GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 458 463 468 467 466 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 471 Mixed 439 SusWrite 466 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 45.6 161% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 358 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 132%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 50GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 1242 1246 1241 1245 1112 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 2,267 Write 2,148 Mixed 1,512 SusWrite 1,263 403% 1,798 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 67.5 236% 84.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,247 DQ Write 1,152 DQ Mixed 1,194 897% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 107GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 104 103 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 109 Write 77.8 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 102 66% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 114%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 66GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 78 78 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 62 Write 82.5 Mixed 85 SusWrite 80 58% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 108%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 111GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 87.8 Write 108 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 80.1 66% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 54.6 MC Mixed 40.1 128% 44.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 9.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $947

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16