Fujitsu CELSIUS H720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB244
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 15:05
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$353
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62.8% Good
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 186
67% 141 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 478
53% 410 Pts
64-Core 487
33% 487 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Fujitsu(10CF 175F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2525
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 24.9
6% 21.1 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 21.4
7% 21.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$55
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 452 288 291 291 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 469
Write 439
Mixed 426
SusWrite 341
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 33.7
108% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$40
421GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 104
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
96GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 21 27 30 39 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 169
Write 77.5
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 36.9
98% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.6
143% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 04CB AD73I1C1674EV Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CELSIUS H720 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback