Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 112 53% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 160 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 3.34 3% 3.74 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 5.78 4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 145 146 144 145 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 393 Write 391 Mixed 319 SusWrite 173 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 32.1 107% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 288 220% 300 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 364GB free Firmware: GH2OA910 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 112 113 112 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 30 SusWrite 112 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5673GB0-CH9 M378B5673GB0-CH9 M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.5 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16