Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '19 at 11:32
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 203 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 562 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 579 36% 579 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 8A96) 2GB CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.42% Terrible	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 12.2 8% 10.1 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 12.2 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.42% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 246 128 131 126 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 440 Mixed 354 SusWrite 188 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 47.5 163% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 351 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 124%
Seagate ST2000DX001-1NS164 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 207 197 196 206 195 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 184 Write 191 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 199 120% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 188% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 80%
Inateck ASM1153E 4TB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 446GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 98 97 98 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 98.5 SusWrite 96.6 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 2x8GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	74x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	69x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	17x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16