PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A62 |
Motherboard | MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161130 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '19 at 09:55 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | CYP-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 98 44 42 57 53 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 360 348 354 320 301 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
548GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 134 134 133 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 180x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 146x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 138x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 169x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 99x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 89x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $575 |