PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H77-M (all builds) |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121015 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '19 at 09:08 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
33.6%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 74 71 79 80 71 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
425GB free
Firmware: MX1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 68 66 68 69 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 248x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 113x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 58x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 57x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $454 |