Asus WS X299 SAGE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus WS X299 SAGE  (all builds)
Memory117.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171213
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 23:19
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,575
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.8% Very good
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
81% 173 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 828
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 2,468
166% 2,468 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$750
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 434
Reflection 501
Parallax 597
114% 511 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 483
Splatting 264
126% 330 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 125%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$350
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,597
Write 1,630
Mixed 776
296% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 51.3
190% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 901
680% 920 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 302%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$115
1.5TB free
Firmware: RR07
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 139
Write 206
Mixed 109
113% 152 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
388% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 112%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$171
5.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 204
Write 194
Mixed 70.2
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
612% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$171
5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 185
Write 184
Mixed 72.3
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
509% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 163
Write 131
Mixed 89.8
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 102%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 39
Write 35.8
Mixed 32.8
45% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 66.9
MC Mixed 44.2
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 11.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 247
16% 247 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 123%
Great: 173%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical WS X299 SAGE Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 SAGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $2,617
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $229Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $339Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback