Lenovo 30D10016US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30D10016US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 314F
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 883
85% 702 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 314F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6860
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 8.03
5% 8.77 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 16.4
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,874
Write 1,832
Mixed 1,306
372% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 60.5
200% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 852
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 674
529% 735 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback