Asus M4A78LT-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus M4A78LT-M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 21:31
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.4% Average
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 120
44% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 342
37% 288 Pts
64-Core 356
24% 356 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 136
Reflection 111
Parallax 122
36% 123 fps
MRender 82.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 80
32% 93.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$25
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 13 19 30 28 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 111
Write 34.6
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 29.5
12% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 9
55% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 12
13% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 79%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$78
111GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 37 41 50 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.7% Very poor
Read 45.2
Write 116
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 48.9
15% 66 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 9.1
26% 8.73 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 18.5
19% 29.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 172 174 175 174 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 152
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 169
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 109%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.3
4% 3.33 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4A78LT-M Builds (Compare 894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback