Zoostorm 7200-5199A

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5199A (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI B150 PC MATE (MS-7971)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160601
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 89.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 627 62% 507 Pts	64-Core 621 38% 621 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 137 Parallax 117 108% 129 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 130 Splatting 103 92% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT256G1122 256GB 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 289 309 310 309 314 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 480 Write 290 Mixed 230 SusWrite 303 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 15.1 99% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 84.8 109% 192 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 84%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 118 118 118 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 102 Write 110 Mixed 72 SusWrite 117 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 96%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 18.7 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 18.1 25% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 93% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 19.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5199A Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

System: Zoostorm 7200-5199A

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	2x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 480 GB 480GBSandiskBench 45%, 8,604 samples	2x
SD8SNAT256G1122 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,971 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	5x
KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2666C16/8G 24GBKingstonBench 72%, 105 samples	2x
KHX2400C12D4/8GX KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GBKingstonBench 69%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16