Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180118
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 20:08
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 140 2-Core 276 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 765 74% 608 Pts	64-Core 767 48% 767 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Lighting 82.1 Reflection 58.4 Parallax 124 67% 88.3 fps	MRender 59.3 Gravity 95.8 Splatting 75.1 63% 76.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1383 1393 1438 1443 1443 1442 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,075 Write 1,436 Mixed 844 SusWrite 1,424 322% 1,445 MB/s	4K Read 50.4 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 64.1 253% 97.7 MB/s	DQ Read 51.2 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 370 216% 214 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 283%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 6.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 424 424 418 426 432 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 726GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 152 153 155 156 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 152 Write 121 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 154 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.8 341% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3400 C16 2x16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 42.1 MC Mixed 31.6 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 45.1 SC Mixed 33.6 96% 33.6 GB/s	Latency 50.3 80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	73x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	50x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	13x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	7x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	8x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 13,141 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $693

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16