Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 79.4 2-Core 158 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 469 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 1,112 69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 32 21% 27.2 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 29.9 Splatting 22.3 23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 259 261 260 258 258 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 435 Write 406 Mixed 291 SusWrite 262 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 21.7 72% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 206 173% 252 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 94%
Thnsn51t02du7 TOSHIBA 1TB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 2TB free Firmware: 57HA4103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 1182 1145 1134 1172 1158 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,410 Write 1,221 Mixed 1,288 SusWrite 1,163 286% 1,271 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 37.8 128% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 534 DQ Write 397 DQ Mixed 467 349% 466 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 249%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 167 167 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 159 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 166 95% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Samsung M393B... 80GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 19 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16