Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5757M APU 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 52.3 1-Core 14 2-Core 27.3 24% 31.2 Pts	4-Core 31.4 8-Core 39.5 5% 35.5 Pts	64-Core 41 2% 41 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1297 2064) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 6.69 3% 5.46 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 4.61 4% 4.19 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.G SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 135 97 141 143 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 343 Write 334 Mixed 234 SusWrite 142 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 13.9 46% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 82.9 DQ Mixed 99.2 73% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown A1_ 1x8GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-5757M APUAMDBench 44%, 1,325 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	8x

SSD
S3 SSD 256GBVi550Bench 75%, 1,488 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16