Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 14:43
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 135
62% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 414
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 88
Parallax 91.3
77% 91.3 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 83.1
Splatting 81.3
79% 99 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 285 351 362 365 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 494
Write 376
Mixed 315
SusWrite 322
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 34.8
118% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 184
150% 213 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 103%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
93GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 178 186 198 199 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 468
Write 195
Mixed 229
SusWrite 184
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 15.1
92% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 29.6
50% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 72%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
330GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 258 311 315 319 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 365
Write 319
Mixed 314
SusWrite 285
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 43.7
146% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 242
183% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 14.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback