Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 13:49
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5960X-$600
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
82% 174 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 828
81% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,189
80% 1,189 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,100
MSI(1462 3713) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Lighting 80
Reflection 420
Parallax 587
21% 362 fps
MRender 547
Gravity 704
Splatting 336
196% 529 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 187%
Great: 197%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$85
477GB free
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 222 220 220 218 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 444
Mixed 429
SusWrite 221
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 49.3
161% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 255
210% 298 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$178
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 1228 1228 1225 1191 1143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,494
Write 2,209
Mixed 1509
SusWrite 1,252
417% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 66.9
220% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 818
633% 862 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 284%
Great: 357%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$650
3TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 505 506 506 505 505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 89% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$150
128GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 223 223 221 219 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 477
Mixed 448
SusWrite 222
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 46.1
152% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 357
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$30
287GB free
Firmware: 07.04C07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 88 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 85
Write 87
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 86.2
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 63%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$108
377GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 117 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 139
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 117
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 111%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 93.7
Write 68.5
Mixed 39
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$60
458GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 125
Write 73.5
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 113
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
158GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 44.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 59.7
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
151% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$56
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 198 199 199 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 154
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 198
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$90
144GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 75 73 75 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 78.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 74
51% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1
151% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 74%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$119
965GB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 145 143 142 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 170
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 145
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR KHX2666C16/16G G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR KHX2133C14/16G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 42.2
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 21
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 4,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,296
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback