Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING (all builds)
Memory	56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 12:49
Run Duration	401 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 237 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 820 77% 642 Pts	64-Core 1227 76% 1227 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3713) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56% Above average	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 256 0% 96.3 fps	MRender 258 Gravity 228 Splatting 142 164% 209 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 477GB free Firmware: LHF004C SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 228 225 226 223 222 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 429 Mixed 376 SusWrite 226 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 49.9 157% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 255 210% 299 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 545GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1143 1153 1153 1114 994 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,491 Write 2,261 Mixed 1495 SusWrite 1,172 415% 1,855 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 67.5 230% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 820 DQ Write 931 DQ Mixed 874 659% 875 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 3TB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 505 506 506 506 505 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 128GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 229 227 228 225 224 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 476 Mixed 460 SusWrite 228 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 47.3 154% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 354 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 133%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 287GB free Firmware: 07.04C07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 86 88 88 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 89 Write 87 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 87.1 60% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 62%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 377GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 116 116 118 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 127 Write 138 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 117 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 97.8 Write 89.3 Mixed 35.7 54% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 458GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 114 115 116 116 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 114 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 158GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 51.8 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 57.1 41% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.4 140% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 200 201 202 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 154 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 199 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 144GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 74 70 73 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 72.3 Write 36.7 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 72.9 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 72%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 965GB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 149 150 149 148 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 176 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 150 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.8 206% 2 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR KHX2666C16/16G G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR KHX2133C14/16G 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	113% Outstanding	MC Read 48.6 MC Write 42 MC Mixed 41.5 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 21.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	522x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	256x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	242x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	282x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	173x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	154x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	41x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	41x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,272 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $897

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16