Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 12:49
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5960X-$600
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
82% 175 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 816
80% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,202
81% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,100
MSI(1462 3713) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Lighting 1
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 819
0% 302 fps
MRender 541
Gravity 684
Splatting 328
192% 518 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 182%
Great: 197%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$85
477GB free
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 228 225 226 223 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 429
Mixed 376
SusWrite 226
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 49.9
157% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 255
210% 299 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$178
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1143 1153 1153 1114 994 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,491
Write 2,261
Mixed 1495
SusWrite 1,172
415% 1,855 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 67.5
230% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 874
659% 875 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 281%
Great: 357%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$650
3TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 505 506 506 506 505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 89% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$150
128GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 229 227 228 225 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 460
SusWrite 228
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$30
287GB free
Firmware: 07.04C07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 89
Write 87
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.1
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 63%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$108
377GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 116 116 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 138
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 117
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 111%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 97.8
Write 89.3
Mixed 35.7
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$60
458GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 114 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 114
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
158GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 51.8
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 57.1
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
140% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$56
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 200 201 202 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 154
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 199
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$90
144GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 74 70 73 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.3
Write 36.7
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 72.9
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 74%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$119
965GB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 149 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 176
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 150
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR KHX2666C16/16G G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GRR KHX2133C14/16G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 48.6
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 41.5
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 21.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 113%
Great: 118%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 4,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,296
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback