Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 10:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 188
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 18 18 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 24.8
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 19.6
20% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
185GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 110 111 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 109
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 6GB
1600, 1200 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback