Eurocom Racer 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Eurocom Racer 2.0 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM Racer 2.0
Memory	29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 06:30
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 180 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 448 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Clevo(1558 5281) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4120 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Lighting 52.4 Reflection 53.7 Parallax 52.4 43% 52.8 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 49.2 Splatting 49.5 43% 52.8 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB 6,648 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT4AD0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 198 227 232 237 236 MB/s Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.7% Above average	Read 245 Write 232 Mixed 152 SusWrite 222 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 20.8 73% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 72.3 88% 155 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 842GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 110 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 109 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-082.A00LF 99U5428-100.A00LF 32GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.4% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Racer 2.0 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Racer 2.0

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	6x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	1x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples	2x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	1x

SSD
PM851 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,419 samples	2x
MZMPC128HBFU-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,498 samples	1x
Vector 150 240GBOCZ $246Bench 89%, 1,607 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6EFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 16GBHynixBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 4x4GBElpidaBench 53%, 447 samples	1x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16