Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180214
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 04:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 176
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 231
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1A58 674D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 7.09
6% 7.89 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 13.4
8% 9.45 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV256 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 182 145 163 156 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 262
Mixed 272
SusWrite 167
90% 412 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 27
142% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 583
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 339
272% 390 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 147%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
329GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 99.9
Write 101
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 110
116% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 20.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 19
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback