Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 02:37
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 136
56% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 331
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 4.56
5% 5.79 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 8.61
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 50.7
Reflection 56
Parallax 49.7
41% 52.1 fps
MRender 57
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 53.4
44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 187 178 204 164 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,291
Write 788
Mixed 602
SusWrite 175
158% 714 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 34.3
113% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 122
160% 297 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 115%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 125 124 124 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 124
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback