Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 02:37
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.1% Average
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 123
49% 101 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 294
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 393
26% 393 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 14.6
5% 16.8 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 19.8
4% 14.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.1% Average
Lighting 152
Reflection 146
Parallax 159
40% 152 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 151
Splatting 123
42% 131 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 49%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 187 178 204 164 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,291
Write 788
Mixed 602
SusWrite 175
158% 714 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 34.3
113% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 122
160% 297 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 115%
Great: 205%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 125 124 124 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 124
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback