Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090505
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 01:37
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 139
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 345
39% 304 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 31.1
21% 28.8 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 31.4
23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
7GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 164
Write 175
Mixed 172
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 23.3
74% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 51.6
DQ Mixed 35.7
28% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 35 14 9.7 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 47.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 17.8
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 37 21 19 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 24.2
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 70%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.9 6.5 6.4 6.8 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 1
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 5.8
5% 3.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $184
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback