Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	38.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180803
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 00:44
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9920X-$587 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 131 2-Core 264 83% 155 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 936 81% 694 Pts	64-Core 2,135 132% 2,135 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 196 Parallax 186 134% 182 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 173 Splatting 119 111% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 443 443 441 448 443 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 448 Mixed 333 SusWrite 445 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 31.1 130% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 279 228% 324 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 531GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 449 448 446 450 447 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 450 Mixed 432 SusWrite 450 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 46 162% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 6x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 6 of 8 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.5% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 23.1 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 8.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16