Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 00:41
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 18
2-Core 64
17% 41 Pts
4-Core 76.1
8-Core 86.9
11% 81.5 Pts
64-Core 85.4
5% 85.4 Pts
Poor: 25% Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 0.97
2% 2.05 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 5.9 208 121 79 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 308
Write 408
Mixed 195
SusWrite 115
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 16.6
84% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 291
194% 230 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.1
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 5
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 586
7% 586 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $189
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback