PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7817 |
Motherboard | MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150330 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '19 at 15:37 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 121 119 118 116 115 MB/s
|
97%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
13GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 66 64 70 84 72 MB/s
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 337x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 149x |
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 87x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 84x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 84x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $246 |