Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 13:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 317
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 950
98% 792 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 91.2
Parallax 74.1
64% 81.1 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 93.7
78% 95.2 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 729 430 431 434 433 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,605
Write 2085
Mixed 1,538
SusWrite 479
373% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 99.8
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 1,494
DQ Mixed 1,163
904% 1,221 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 294%
Great: 280%
Plextor PX-256M9PeG 256GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1.07
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,003
Write 994
Mixed 1,067
298% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 89.4
308% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 720
590% 833 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 205%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 69 83 73 76 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 16.2
Write 1.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 79
31% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
184% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 48
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 43.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback