Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 91.8 2-Core 182 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 534 56% 450 Pts	64-Core 682 42% 682 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 31.9 29% 31 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 32.7 Splatting 32.3 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 354 Write 148 Mixed 198 51% 234 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 15.8 67% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 53.6 DQ Mixed 82 82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 76 84 86 85 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 145 Write 150 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 81.7 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 212% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GB 761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 34.5 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16