Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 04:59
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-6098P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60% Good
1-Core 110
2-Core 198
74% 154 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 288
39% 284 Pts
64-Core 276
18% 276 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 129
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 172
34% 124 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 127
Splatting 89.7
33% 93 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 104 110 99 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 238
Write 135
Mixed 141
SusWrite 103
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 19
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 68.1
62% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 48%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
475GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 1082 1087 1092 1065 1091 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,111
Write 934
Mixed 924
SusWrite 1,061
227% 1,007 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 80.1
266% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 1,147
868% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 244%
Great: 398%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
392GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 176 177 180 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 176
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 176
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 5,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $137

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,050
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $22Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback