ADD TO PC
BUILD

Zotac H61

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Zotac H61 (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '19 at 02:33
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 184 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 357 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% MSI(1462 2321) 768MB CLim: 727 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.7 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 14 13% 16 fps	MRender 21.2 Gravity 15.1 Splatting 15.7 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 424GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 117 165 135 89 142 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 224 Write 210 Mixed 169 SusWrite 136 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 14 48% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 11.7 Mixed 9 SusWrite 10.7 18% 16 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.8 102% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 17%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.2 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 4 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 4.2 7% 6.38 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.5 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback