Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '19 at 02:11
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 70.8 1-Core 155 2-Core 263 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 882 84% 696 Pts	64-Core 2,180 135% 2,180 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 97%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Lighting 78.5 Reflection 81.5 Parallax 110 64% 90.1 fps	MRender 78.3 Gravity 79.1 Splatting 64.4 60% 73.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 62%
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AMD(1002 0B36) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 96.9 Parallax 192 94% 135 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 107 Splatting 133 94% 112 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 151 153 145 147 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 443 Mixed 394 SusWrite 178 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 51.6 171% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 199 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 466GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 445 442 403 442 382 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 449 Mixed 422 SusWrite 419 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 56.7 185% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 198 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 129%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 111GB free Firmware: 1.3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 123 124 122 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 386 Write 148 Mixed 195 SusWrite 120 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 28.7 99% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 158 119% 161 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 83%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 236 238 237 239 238 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 149GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 60.9 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 59.6 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 36%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 184 182 178 191 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 170 Mixed 68 SusWrite 182 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 327% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 677 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1.5TB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 30 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 101 Write 30.7 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 30.4 53% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB 19,774 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 28.3 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 27.6 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) - $400

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	839x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	579x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	375x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	359x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	347x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	333x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	261x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	164x

RAM
Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 2x16GBGBench 106%, 9,865 samples	166x
Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 4x16GBGBench 107%, 3,536 samples	99x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,657

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16