Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$159 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 22.4 2-Core 43.8 32% 44 Pts	4-Core 43.9 8-Core 44.3 6% 44.1 Pts	64-Core 40.7 2% 40.7 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 45%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$79 2,695 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: PC2OC72E Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 85 Write 83.8 Mixed 46.9 53% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 13GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 18.6 Mixed 5.3 10% 12 MB/s	4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%
Kingston DataTraveler2.0 1GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 160b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 6.3 Write 2 Mixed 2.5 4% 3.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T9900Intel $159Bench 41%, 1,008 samples	5x
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples	5x
Core2 Extreme X9100Intel $150Bench 41%, 548 samples	4x

GPU
Quadro FX 770MNvidiaBench 2%, 849 samples	23x
Quadro FX 1700MNvidiaBench 2%, 89 samples	8x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
BT58SSD07S 120GBBench 59%, 385 samples	2x
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	2x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $202

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16