Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9220C RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 288 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.31% Terrible	Memory 10.6 1-Core 11.2 2-Core 38.6 10% 20.1 Pts	4-Core 48.7 8-Core 36.3 6% 42.5 Pts	64-Core 42.6 3% 42.6 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.31% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39EA) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 18.40.23.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk 64GB 63GB 347 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 27 32 33 28 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 99.7 Write 29.7 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 30.6 42% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 4.2 719% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.8 GB/s	Latency 398 10% 398 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-9220C RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 29%, 288 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	1x

RAM
MTAF5121G64HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 18%, 57 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16