Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151208
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 198
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 501
53% 423 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 6.31
6% 5.79 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 7.93
Splatting 8.57
7% 8.72 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 289 279 277 271 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 472
Mixed 385
SusWrite 282
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 44
146% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 28.7
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 18.2
20% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 26.8
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 15.9
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 1TB
848GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 101 101 99 100 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 93.2
Write 93.6
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 95.3
112% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 34.4
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback