Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$294
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
84% 143 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 678
72% 563 Pts
64-Core 833
56% 833 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1658 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.9% Good
Lighting 81.7
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 69.2
65% 62.4 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 61.7
37% 61.4 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 71%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$374
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1109 1359 1335 897 618 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 1,398
Mixed 933
SusWrite 1,048
277% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58.4
200% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 366
339% 535 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 216%
Great: 259%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$60
87GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 277 290 297 298 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 462
Mixed 412
SusWrite 304
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 57.9
192% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$80
356GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 75 88 106 113 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 82.3
Write 124
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 96.9
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
210% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$74
714GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 164 168 169 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 125
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 164
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$74
646GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 128
Write 93.5
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 96.2
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$74
326GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 138
Write 97.8
Mixed 83
SusWrite 96.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 51.7
MC Mixed 41.7
128% 45 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.2
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,183
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback