bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DQ67SW
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '19 at 18:18
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 192 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 471 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 36.3 31% 34.7 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.4 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 496 495 494 405 358 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 288GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 75.2 Write 51.3 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 77.6 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 43%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 120GB 433 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 81GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 34 33 33 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 33.8 Write 32 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 33.5 45% 33 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 10.3 843% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 11 DQ Write 17.7 DQ Mixed 12.9 1,082% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 16.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,019x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,563x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	930x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,037x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16