Positivo 160S1610HN2C

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Positivo 160S1610HN2C (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo GJ5CN6E
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180716
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '19 at 12:56
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 86.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 253 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 785 77% 628 Pts	64-Core 909 56% 909 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1D05 1045) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.7% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 55.3 47% 61.2 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 55.6 Splatting 66.2 52% 63 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$59 14,978 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 434 436 434 435 436 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 840 Write 1,273 Mixed 874 SusWrite 470 195% 864 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 61.9 211% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 848 DQ Write 953 DQ Mixed 805 633% 869 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 238%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 892GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 134 135 135 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 146 Write 136 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 135 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.6 229% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 1x16GB 6,417 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 13.7 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Positivo 160S1610HN2C

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)